@article {Rokitta2016, title = {P- and n-depletion trigger similar cellular responses to promote senescence in eukaryotic phytoplankton}, journal = {Frontiers in Marine Science}, volume = {3}, number = {July}, year = {2016}, note = {tex.mendeley-tags: 2016,RCC1217,RCC126}, month = {jun}, keywords = {2016, rcc1217, RCC126}, issn = {2296-7745}, doi = {10.3389/fmars.2016.00109}, url = {http://journal.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fmars.2016.00109 http://journal.frontiersin.org/Article/10.3389/fmars.2016.00109/abstract}, author = {Rokitta, Sebastian D. and von Dassow, Peter and Rost, Bj{\"o}rn and John, Uwe} } @article {Bendif2016, title = {Recent reticulate evolution in the ecologically dominant lineage of coccolithophores}, journal = {Frontiers in Microbiology}, volume = {7}, number = {May}, year = {2016}, note = {tex.mendeley-tags: 2016,RCC4032,RCC4033,RCC4034,RCC4035,RCC4036,rcc,sbr?hyto}, month = {may}, keywords = {2016, coccolithophores, cyto-nuclear discordance, diversity, Emiliania, evolution, Gephyrocapsa, introgressive hybridization, rcc, RCC4032, RCC4033, RCC4034, RCC4035, RCC4036, Reticulofenestra, sbr?hyto}, issn = {1664-302X}, doi = {10.3389/fmicb.2016.00784}, url = {http://journal.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fmicb.2016.00784 http://journal.frontiersin.org/Article/10.3389/fmicb.2016.00784/abstract}, author = {Bendif, El Mahdi and Probert, Ian and D{\'\i}az-Rosas, Francisco and Thomas, Daniela and van den Engh, Ger and Young, Jeremy R. and von Dassow, Peter} } @article {Bendif2015, title = {Morphological and phylogenetic characterization of new gephyrocapsa isolates suggests introgressive hybridization in the Emiliania/Gephyrocapsa complex (haptophyta)}, journal = {Protist}, volume = {166}, number = {3}, year = {2015}, note = {tex.mendeley-tags: 2015,RCC1281,RCC1282,RCC1284,RCC1286,RCC1292,RCC1300,RCC1305,RCC1307,RCC1316,RCC1317,RCC1318,RCC1319,RCC1320,RCC1562,RCC1839,RCC3370,RCC3862,RCC3898,rcc}, pages = {323{\textendash}336}, abstract = {The coccolithophore genus Gephyrocapsa contains a cosmopolitan assemblage of pelagic species, including the bloom-forming Gephyrocapsa oceanica, and is closely related to the emblematic coccolithophore Emiliania huxleyi within the No{\"e}laerhabdaceae. These two species have been extensively studied and are well represented in culture collections, whereas cultures of other species of this family are lacking. We report on three new strains of Gephyrocapsa isolated into culture from samples from the Chilean coastal upwelling zone using a novel flow cytometric single-cell sorting technique. The strains were characterized by morphological analysis using scanning electron microscopy and phylogenetic analysis of 6 genes (nuclear 18S and 28S rDNA, plastidial 16S and tufA, and mitochondrial cox1 and cox3 genes). Morphometric features of the coccoliths indicate that these isolates are distinct from G. oceanica and best correspond to G. muellerae. Surprisingly, both plastidial and mitochondrial gene phylogenies placed these strains within the E. huxleyi clade and well separated from G. oceanica isolates, making Emiliania appear polyphyletic. The only nuclear sequence difference, 1bp in the 28S rDNA region, also grouped E. huxleyi with the new Gephyrocapsa isolates and apart from G. oceanica. Specifically, the G. muellerae morphotype strains clustered with the mitochondrial β clade of E. huxleyi, which, like G. muellerae, has been associated with cold (temperate and sub-polar) waters. Among putative evolutionary scenarios that could explain these results we discuss the possibility that E. huxleyi is not a valid taxonomic unit, or, alternatively the possibility of past hybridization and introgression between each E. huxleyi clade and older Gephyrocapsa clades. In either case, the results support the transfer of Emiliania to Gephyrocapsa. These results have important implications for relating morphological species concepts to ecological and evolutionary units of diversity.}, keywords = {2015, coccolithophores, Emiliania huxleyi, Gephyrocapsa muellerae, Gephyrocapsa oceanica, hybridization, phylogeny., rcc, RCC1281, RCC1282, RCC1284, RCC1286, RCC1292, RCC1300, RCC1305, RCC1307, RCC1316, RCC1317, RCC1318, RCC1319, RCC1320, RCC1562, RCC1839, RCC3370, RCC3862, RCC3898, species concept}, issn = {14344610}, doi = {10.1016/j.protis.2015.05.003}, url = {http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1434461015000243}, author = {Bendif, El Mahdi and Probert, Ian and Young, Jeremy R. and von Dassow, Peter} } @article {VonDassow2009, title = {Transcriptome analysis of functional differentiation between haploid and diploid cells of Emiliania huxleyi, a globally significant photosynthetic calcifying cell}, journal = {Genome Biology}, volume = {10}, number = {10}, year = {2009}, note = {tex.mendeley-tags: 2009,rcc,rcc1216,rcc1217,sbr?hyto?ppo}, pages = {R114}, abstract = {BACKGROUND:Eukaryotes are classified as either haplontic, diplontic, or haplo-diplontic, depending on which ploidy levels undergo mitotic cell division in the life cycle. Emiliania huxleyi is one of the most abundant phytoplankton species in the ocean, playing an important role in global carbon fluxes, and represents haptophytes, an enigmatic group of unicellular organisms that diverged early in eukaryotic evolution. This species is haplo-diplontic. Little is known about the haploid cells, but they have been hypothesized to allow persistence of the species between the yearly blooms of diploid cells. We sequenced over 38000 Expressed Sequence Tags (ESTs) from haploid and diploid E. huxleyi normalized cDNA libraries to identify genes involved in important processes specific to each life phase (2N calcification or 1N motility), and to better understand the haploid phase of this prominent haplo-diplontic organism.RESULTS:The haploid and diploid transcriptomes showed a dramatic differentiation, with [almost equal to]20\% greater transcriptome richness in diploid cells than in haploid cells and only [less than or equal to]50\% of transcripts estimated to be common between the two phases. The major functional category of transcripts differentiating haploids included signal transduction and motility genes. Diploid-specific transcripts included Ca2+, H+, and HCO3- pumps. Potential factors differentiating the transcriptomes included haploid-specific Myb transcription factor homologs and an unusual diploid-specific histone H4 homolog.CONCLUSIONS:This study permitted the identification of genes likely involved in diploid-specific biomineralization, haploid-specific motility, and transcriptional control. Greater transcriptome richness in diploid cells suggests they may be more versatile for exploiting a diversity of rich environments whereas haploid cells are intrinsically more streamlined.}, keywords = {2009, rcc, RCC1216, rcc1217, SBR$_\textrmP$hyto$_\textrmE$PPO, sbr?hyto?ppo}, doi = {10.1186/gb-2009-10-10-r114}, url = {http://genomebiology.com/2009/10/10/R114}, author = {von Dassow, Peter and Ogata, Hiroyuki and Probert, Ian and Wincker, Patrick and Da Silva, Corinne and Audic, St{\'e}phane and Claverie, Jean-Michel and de Vargas, Colomban} } @article {Bowler2008, title = {The Phaeodactylum genome reveals the evolutionary history of diatom genomes}, journal = {Nature}, volume = {456}, number = {7219}, year = {2008}, note = {Publisher: Macmillan Publishers Limited. All rights reserved tex.mendeley-tags: 2008,rcc,sbr?hyto?ppo}, pages = {239{\textendash}244}, keywords = {2008, rcc, SBR$_\textrmP$hyto$_\textrmE$PPOdipo, sbr?hyto?ppo}, doi = {10.1038/nature07410}, url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nature07410 http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v456/n7219/suppinfo/nature07410_S1.html}, author = {Bowler, Chris and Allen, Andrew E and Badger, Jonathan H and Grimwood, Jane and Jabbari, Kamel and Kuo, Alan and Maheswari, Uma and Martens, Cindy and Maumus, Florian and Otillar, Robert P and Rayko, Edda and Salamov, Asaf and Vandepoele, Klaas and Beszteri, Bank and Gruber, Ansgar and Heijde, Marc and Katinka, Michael and Mock, Thomas and Valentin, Klaus and Verret, Frederic and Berges, John A and Brownlee, Colin and Cadoret, Jean-Paul and Chiovitti, Anthony and Choi, Chang Jae and Coesel, Sacha and De Martino, Alessandra and Detter, J Chris and Durkin, Colleen and Falciatore, Angela and Fournet, Jerome and Haruta, Miyoshi and Huysman, Marie J J and Jenkins, Bethany D and Jiroutova, Katerina and Jorgensen, Richard E and Joubert, Yolaine and Kaplan, Aaron and Kroger, Nils and Kroth, Peter G and La Roche, Julie and Lindquist, Erica and Lommer, Markus and Martin-Jezequel, Veronique and Lopez, Pascal J and Lucas, Susan and Mangogna, Manuela and McGinnis, Karen and Medlin, Linda K and Montsant, Anton and Secq, Marie-Pierre Oudot-Le and Napoli, Carolyn and Obornik, Miroslav and Parker, Micaela Schnitzler and Petit, Jean-Louis and Porcel, Betina M and Poulsen, Nicole and Robison, Matthew and Rychlewski, Leszek and Rynearson, Tatiana A and Schmutz, Jeremy and Shapiro, Harris and Siaut, Magali and Stanley, Michele and Sussman, Michael R and Taylor, Alison R and Vardi, Assaf and von Dassow, Peter and Vyverman, Wim and Willis, Anusuya and Wyrwicz, Lucjan S and Rokhsar, Daniel S and Weissenbach, Jean and Armbrust, E Virginia and Green, Beverley R and Van de Peer, Yves and Grigoriev, Igor V} }