@article {benites_evolutionary_2021,
	title = {Evolutionary Genomics of Sex-Related Chromosomes at the Base of the Green Lineage},
	journal = {Genome Biology and Evolution},
	volume = {13},
	number = {10},
	year = {2021},
	pages = {evab216},
	abstract = {Although sex is now accepted as a ubiquitous and ancestral feature of eukaryotes, direct observation of sex is still lacking in most unicellular eukaryotic lineages. Evidence of sex is frequently indirect and inferred from the identification of genes involved in meiosis from whole genome data and/or the detection of recombination signatures from genetic diversity in natural populations. In haploid unicellular eukaryotes, sex-related chromosomes are named mating-type (MTs) chromosomes and generally carry large genomic regions where recombination is suppressed. These regions have been characterized in Fungi and Chlorophyta and determine gamete compatibility and fusion. Two candidate MT{\th} and MT{\`A} alleles, spanning 450{\textendash}650 kb, have recently been described in Ostreococcus tauri, a marine phytoplanktonic alga from the Mamiellophyceae class, an early diverging branch in the green lineage. Here, we investigate the architecture and evolution of these candidate MT{\th} and MT{\`A} alleles. We analyzed the phylogenetic profile and GC content of MT gene families in eight different genomes whose divergence has been previously estimated at up to 640 Myr, and found evidence that the divergence of the two MT alleles predates speciation in the Ostreococcus genus. Phylogenetic profiles of MT transspecific polymorphisms in gametologs disclosed candidate MTs in two additional species, and possibly a third. These Mamiellales MT candidates are likely to be the oldest mating-type loci described to date, which makes them fascinating models to investigate the evolutionary mechanisms of haploid sex determination in eukaryotes.},
	keywords = {RCC1105, RCC1115, RCC2590, RCC299, rcc3401, RCC4221, RCC809, RCC834},
	issn = {1759-6653},
	doi = {10.1093/gbe/evab216},
	url = {https://academic.oup.com/gbe/article/doi/10.1093/gbe/evab216/6380139},
	author = {Benites, Luis Felipe and Bucchini, Fran{\c c}ois and Sanchez-Brosseau, Sophie and Grimsley, Nigel and Vandepoele, Klaas and Piganeau, Gwenael},
	editor = {Wolfe, Kenneth}
}
@article {Bellec2014,
	title = {Cophylogenetic interactions between marine viruses and eukaryotic picophytoplankton},
	journal = {BMC Evolutionary Biology},
	volume = {14},
	number = {1},
	year = {2014},
	note = {tex.mendeley-tags: RCC1105,RCC1107,RCC1108,RCC1109,RCC114,RCC2482,RCC2483,RCC2484,RCC2485,RCC344,RCC356,RCC373,RCC418,RCC461,RCC464,RCC465,RCC629,RCC658,RCC745,RCC789,RCC834},
	pages = {59},
	abstract = {BACKGROUND:Numerous studies have investigated cospeciation (or cophylogeny) in various host-symbiont systems, and different patterns were inferred, from strict cospeciation where symbiont phylogeny mirrors host phylogeny, to complete absence of correspondence between trees. The degree of cospeciation is generally linked to the level of host specificity in the symbiont species and the opportunity they have to switch hosts. In this study, we investigated cophylogeny for the first time in a microalgae-virus association in the open sea, where symbionts are believed to be highly host-specific but have wide opportunities to switch hosts. We studied prasinovirus-Mamiellales associations using 51 different viral strains infecting 22 host strains, selected from the characterisation and experimental testing of the specificities of 313 virus strains on 26 host strains.RESULTS:All virus strains were restricted to their host genus, and most were species-specific, but some of them were able to infect different host species within a genus. Phylogenetic trees were reconstructed for viruses and their hosts, and their congruence was assessed based on these trees and the specificity data using different cophylogenetic methods, a topology-based approach, Jane, and a global congruence method, ParaFit. We found significant congruence between virus and host trees, but with a putatively complex evolutionary history.CONCLUSIONS:Mechanisms other than true cospeciation, such as host-switching, might explain a part of the data. It has been observed in a previous study on the same taxa that the genomic divergence between host pairs is larger than between their viruses. It implies that if cospeciation predominates in this algae-virus system, this would support the hypothesis that prasinoviruses evolve more slowly than their microalgal hosts, whereas host switching would imply that these viruses speciated more recently than the divergence of their host genera.},
	keywords = {rcc, RCC1105, rcc1107, RCC1108, RCC1109, RCC114, RCC2482, RCC2483, RCC2484, RCC2485, RCC344, RCC356, RCC373, RCC418, RCC461, RCC464, RCC465, RCC629, RCC658, RCC745, RCC789, RCC834, SBR$_\textrmP$hyto$_\textrmD$PO},
	doi = {10.1186/1471-2148-14-59},
	url = {http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2148/14/59},
	author = {Bellec, Laure and Clerissi, Camille and Edern, Roseline and Foulon, Elodie and Simon, Nathalie and Grimsley, Nigel and Desdevises, Yves}
}
