@article {Simon2017,
	title = {Revision of the genus micromonas manton et parke (chlorophyta, mamiellophyceae), of the type species m. pusilla (butcher) manton \& parke and of the species m. commoda van baren, bachy and worden and description of two new species based on the genetic},
	journal = {Protist},
	volume = {168},
	number = {5},
	year = {2017},
	note = {tex.mendeley-tags: 2017,RCC1109,RCC114,RCC2306,RCC2308,RCC299,RCC372,RCC373,RCC418,RCC434,RCC447,RCC448,RCC449,RCC450,RCC451,RCC461,RCC465,RCC472,RCC497,RCC498,RCC570,RCC629,RCC647,RCC658,RCC676,RCC692,RCC746,RCC803,RCC804,RCC805,RCC806,RCC807,RCC808,RCC828,RCC829,RCC830,RCC831,RCC833,RCC834,RCC835,RCC836,sbr?hyto$_\textrmd$ipo},
	month = {nov},
	pages = {612{\textendash}635},
	keywords = {2017, ASSEMBLE, rcc, RCC1109, RCC114, RCC2306, RCC2308, RCC299, RCC372, RCC373, RCC418, RCC434, RCC447, RCC448, RCC449, RCC450, RCC451, RCC461, RCC465, RCC472, RCC497, RCC498, RCC570, RCC629, RCC647, RCC658, RCC676, RCC692, RCC746, RCC803, RCC804, RCC805, RCC806, RCC807, RCC808, RCC828, RCC829, RCC830, RCC831, RCC833, RCC834, RCC835, RCC836, SBR$_\textrmP$hyto$_\textrmD$IPO, SBR$_\textrmP$hyto$_\textrmP$PM, sbr?hyto$_\textrmd$ipo},
	issn = {14344610},
	doi = {10.1016/j.protis.2017.09.002},
	url = {http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S1434461017300780},
	author = {Simon, Nathalie and Foulon, Elodie and Grulois, Daphne and Six, Christophe and Desdevises, Yves and Latimier, Marie and Le Gall, Florence and Tragin, Margot and Houdan, Aude and Derelle, Evelyne and Jouenne, Fabien and Marie, Dominique and Le Panse, Sophie and Vaulot, Daniel and Marin, Birger}
}
@article {Marie2014,
	title = {An improved protocol for flow cytometry analysis of phytoplankton cultures and natural samples},
	journal = {Cytometry},
	volume = {85},
	year = {2014},
	note = {tex.mendeley-tags: RCC100,RCC1085,RCC114,RCC156,RCC168,RCC174,RCC180,RCC190,RCC263,RCC365,RCC400,RCC432,RCC446,RCC475,RCC480,RCC504,RCC745,RCC91},
	pages = {962{\textendash}968},
	abstract = {Preservation of cells, choice of fixative, storage, and thawing conditions are recurrent issues for the analysis of phytoplankton by flow cytometry. We examined the effects of addition of the surfactant Pluronic F68 to glutaraldehyde-fixed photosynthetic organisms in cultures and natural samples. In particular, we examined cell losses and modifications of side scatter (a proxy of cell size) and fluorescence of natural pigments. We found that different marine phytoplankton species react differently to the action of Pluronic F68. In particular, photosynthetic prokaryotes are less sensitive than eukaryotes. Observed cell losses may result from cell lysis or from cell adhesion to the walls of plastic tubes that are commonly used for flow cytometry analysis. The addition of the surfactant, Pluronic F68, has a positive effect on cells for long-term storage. We recommend to modify current protocols for preservation of natural marine planktonic samples, by fixing them with glutaraldehyde 0.25\% (final concentration) and adding Pluronic F68 at a final concentration of 0.01\% in the samples before preservation. Pluronic F68 also appears effective for preserving samples without fixation for subsequent sorting, e.g. for molecular biology analyses. (c) 2014 International Society for Advancement of Cytometry},
	keywords = {ASSEMBLE, MACUMBA, RCC100, RCC1085, RCC114, RCC156, RCC168, rcc174, RCC180, RCC190, RCC263, RCC365, RCC400, RCC432, RCC446, RCC475, RCC480, RCC504, RCC745, RCC91, RCC?o?dd, SBR$_\textrmP$hyto$_\textrmD$PO},
	doi = {10.1002/cyto.a.22517},
	author = {Marie, D and Rigaut-Jalabert, F and Vaulot, D}
}
@article {Rousseau2013,
	title = {Characterization of {\textexclamdown}i{\textquestiondown}Phaeocystis globosa{\textexclamdown}/i{\textquestiondown} (haptophyceae), the blooming species in the southern north sea},
	journal = {Journal of Sea Research},
	volume = {76},
	year = {2013},
	note = {tex.mendeley-tags: 2013,rcc,sbr?hyto$_\textrmd$ipo},
	pages = {105{\textendash}113},
	keywords = {2013, ASSEMBLE, rcc, SBR$_\textrmP$hyto$_\textrmD$PO, sbr?hyto$_\textrmd$ipo, Souchotheque},
	doi = {10.1016/j.seares.2012.07.011},
	author = {Rousseau, V and Lantoine, F and Rodriguez, F and Le Gall, F and Chr{\'e}tiennot-Dinet, M.-J. and Lancelot, C}
}
@article {Balzano2012,
	title = {Composition of the summer photosynthetic pico and nanoplankton communities in the Beaufort Sea assessed by T-RFLP and sequences of the 18S rRNA gene from flow cytometry sorted samples},
	journal = {The ISME journal},
	volume = {6},
	number = {8},
	year = {2012},
	note = {ISBN: 1751-7362 tex.mendeley-tags: 2012,rcc,sbr?hyto$_\textrmd$ipo},
	pages = {1480{\textendash}1498},
	abstract = {The composition of photosynthetic pico and nanoeukaryotes was investigated in the North East Pacific and the Arctic Ocean with special emphasis on the Beaufort Sea during the MALINA cruise in summer 2009. Photosynthetic populations were sorted using flow cytometry based on their size and pigment fluorescence. Diversity of the sorted photosynthetic eukaryotes was determined using terminal-restriction fragment length polymorphism analysis and cloning/sequencing of the 18S ribosomal RNA gene. Picoplankton was dominated by Mamiellophyceae, a class of small green algae previously included in the prasinophytes: in the North East Pacific, the contribution of an Arctic Micromonas ecotype increased steadily northward becoming the only taxon occurring at most stations throughout the Beaufort Sea. In contrast, nanoplankton was more diverse: North Pacific stations were dominated by Pseudo-nitzschia sp. whereas those in the Beaufort Sea were dominated by two distinct Chaetoceros species as well as by Chrysophyceae, Pelagophyceae and Chrysochromulina spp.. This study confirms the importance of Arctic Micromonas within picoplankton throughout the Beaufort Sea and demonstrates that the photosynthetic picoeukaryote community in the Arctic is much less diverse than at lower latitudes. Moreover, in contrast to what occurs in warmer waters, most of the key pico- and nanoplankton species found in the Beaufort Sea could be successfully established in culture.},
	keywords = {2012, ASSEMBLE, Chaetoceros, MALINA, Pyramimonas, rcc, SBR$_\textrmP$hyto$_\textrmD$PO, sbr?hyto$_\textrmd$ipo, Souchotheque},
	issn = {1751-7362},
	doi = {10.1038/ismej.2011.213},
	author = {Balzano, Sergio and Marie, Dominique and Gourvil, Priscillia and Vaulot, Daniel}
}
@article {Balzano2012a,
	title = {Diversity of cultured photosynthetic flagellates in the North East Pacific and Arctic Oceans in summer},
	journal = {Biogeosciences},
	volume = {9},
	year = {2012},
	note = {tex.mendeley-tags: 2012,macumba,rcc,sbr?hyto$_\textrmd$ipo},
	pages = {4553{\textendash}4571},
	keywords = {2012, ASSEMBLE, MACUMBA, MALINA, rcc, SBR$_\textrmP$hyto$_\textrmD$PO, sbr?hyto$_\textrmd$ipo},
	doi = {10.5194/bg-9-4553-2012},
	author = {Balzano, Sergio and Gourvil, Priscillia and Siano, Raffaele and Chanoine, M{\'e}lanie and Marie, Dominique and Lessard, Sylvie and Sarno, Diana and Vaulot, Daniel}
}
@article {Stern2012,
	title = {Evaluating the ribosomal internal transcribed spacer (ITS) as a candidate dinoflagellate barcode marker},
	journal = {PLoS ONE},
	volume = {7},
	year = {2012},
	note = {tex.mendeley-tags: 2012,rcc,sbr?hyto$_\textrmd$ipo},
	pages = {e42780},
	keywords = {2012, ASSEMBLE, Barcoding, ITS, rcc, SBR$_\textrmP$hyto$_\textrmD$PO, sbr?hyto$_\textrmd$ipo},
	doi = {10.1371/journal.pone.0042780},
	url = {http://www.plosone.org/article/info\%253Adoi\%252F10.1371\%252Fjournal.pone.0042780},
	author = {Stern, Rowena F and Andersen, Robert A and Jameson, Ian and K{\"u}pper, Frithjof C and Coffroth, Mary-Alice and Vaulot, Daniel and Gall, Florence Le and Veron, Benoit and Brand, Jerry J and Skelton, Hayley and Kasai, Fumai and Lilly, Emily L and Keeling, Patrick J}
}
@article {Bendif2011,
	title = {Integrative taxonomy of the pavlovophyceae (haptophyta) : a reassessment},
	journal = {Protist},
	volume = {162},
	year = {2011},
	note = {tex.mendeley-tags: 2011,RCC1526,RCC1527,RCC1528,RCC1529,RCC1530,RCC1531,RCC1532,RCC1533,RCC1534,RCC1535,RCC1536,RCC1537,RCC1538,RCC1539,RCC1540,RCC1541,RCC1542,RCC1543,RCC1544,RCC1545,RCC1546,RCC1548,RCC1549,RCC1551,RCC1552,RCC1553,RCC1554,RCC1557,rcc,rcc1523,rcc1524,rcc1525},
	pages = {738{\textendash}761},
	abstract = {The Pavlovophyceae (Haptophyta) contains four genera (Pavlova, Diacronema, Exanthemachrysis and Rebecca) and only thirteen characterised species. Considering the importance of members of this class, we constructed molecular phylogenies inferred from sequencing of ribosomal gene markers with comprehensive coverage of the described diversity and using type strains when available add on culture strains. Moreover, the morphology and ultrastructure of 12 of the described species was re-examined and the pigment signatures of many culture strains were determined. The molecular analysis revealed that sequences of all described species differed, although those of Pavlova gyrans and P. pinguis were nearly identical, these potentially forming a single cryptic species complex. Four well-delineated genetic clades were identified, one of which included species of both Pavlova andDiacronema. Unique combinations of morphological/ultrastructural characters were identified foreach of these clades. The ancestral pigment signature of the Pavlovophyceae consisted of a basic set of pigments plus MV chl cPAV, the latter being entirely absent in the Pavlova + Diacronema clade and supplemented by DV chl cPAV in part of the Exanthemachrysis clade. Based on this combination of characters, we propose a taxonomic revision of the class, with transfer of several Pavlova species to an emended Diacronema genus. The evolution of the class is discussed in the context of the phylogenetic reconstruction presented.},
	keywords = {2011, ASSEMBLE, rcc, RCC1523, rcc1524, rcc1525, RCC1526, RCC1527, RCC1528, RCC1529, RCC1530, RCC1531, RCC1532, RCC1533, RCC1534, RCC1535, RCC1536, RCC1537, RCC1538, RCC1539, RCC1540, RCC1541, RCC1542, RCC1543, RCC1544, RCC1545, RCC1546, RCC1548, RCC1549, RCC1551, RCC1552, RCC1553, RCC1554, RCC1557, SBR$_\textrmP$hyto$_\textrmE$PPO},
	doi = {10.1016/j.protis.2011.05.001},
	author = {Bendif, E M and Probert, I and Herv{\'e}, A and Billard, C and Goux, D and Lelong, C and Cadoret, J P and V{\'e}ron, B}
}
@article {Edvardsen2011,
	title = {Ribosomal DNA phylogenies and a morphological revision privide the basis for a new taxonomy of Prymnesiales (Haptophyta)},
	journal = {European Journal of Phycology},
	volume = {46},
	year = {2011},
	note = {tex.mendeley-tags: 2011,RCC1185,RCC1187,RCC1189,RCC1385,RCC1387,RCC1388,RCC1390,RCC1432,RCC1438,RCC1440,RCC1441,RCC1448,RCC1453,RCC2056,RCC2057,RCC2059,RCC2060,RCC2061,RCC2063,RCC2064,RCC305,RCC339,RCC3417,RCC3421,RCC3422,RCC3424,RCC3425,RCC3429,RCC406,rcc},
	pages = {202{\textendash}228},
	keywords = {2011, ASSEMBLE, rcc, RCC1185, RCC1187, RCC1189, RCC1385, RCC1387, RCC1388, RCC1390, RCC1432, RCC1438, RCC1440, RCC1441, RCC1448, RCC1453, RCC2056, RCC2057, RCC2059, RCC2060, RCC2061, RCC2063, RCC2064, RCC305, RCC339, RCC3417, RCC3421, RCC3422, RCC3424, RCC3425, RCC3429, RCC406, SBR$_\textrmP$hyto$_\textrmE$PPO},
	doi = {10.1080/09670262.2011.594095},
	author = {Edvardsen, B and Eikrem, W and Throndsen, J and A., Saez and Probert, I and Medlin, L}
}
@article {Siano2010,
	title = {Pelagodinium gen. nov. and P. beii comb. nov., a dinoflagellate symbiont of planktonic foraminifera},
	journal = {Protist},
	volume = {161},
	year = {2010},
	note = {tex.mendeley-tags: 2010,rcc,rcc1491,sbr?hyto?ppo},
	pages = {385{\textendash}399},
	abstract = {The taxonomic status of the free-living stage of the dinoflagellate Gymnodinium b{\'e}ii, symbiont of the foraminifer Orbulina universa, was reassessed on the basis of detailed morpho-genetic analyses. Electron microscopy observations revealed previously undescribed morphological features of the cell that are important for species recognition. The presence of a single elongated apical vesicle (EAV) ornamented with a row of small knobs, absent in species of the genus Gymnodinium, calls into question the current taxonomic position of the symbiont. The presence of a type E extraplastidial eyespot, the arrangement of the amphiesmal vesicles in series and the absence of trichocysts confirm the affiliation with other symbiotic dinoflagellates and certain genetically related non-symbiotic genera, all belonging to the order Suessiales. The arrangement of the series of vesicles of the analyzed strain is unique within the Suessiales, and the ultrastructure of the pyrenoid is different from other symbiotic dinoflagellates. A large subunit (LSU) rDNA phylogenetic analysis confirmed that the analyzed pelagic symbiont clusters in an independent, well-supported clade within the Suessiales with other sequences of symbiotic dinoflagellates extracted from planktonic foraminifera. Hence a novel genus, Pelagodinium gen. nov., is erected for this pelagic, symbiotic dinoflagellate, and Gymnodinium b{\'e}ii is reclassified as Pelagodinium b{\'e}ii.},
	keywords = {2010, ASSEMBLE, rcc, rcc1491, SBR$_\textrmP$hyto$_\textrmE$PPO, sbr?hyto?ppo},
	doi = {10.1016/j.protis.2010.01.002},
	author = {Siano, R and Montresor, M and Probert, I and Not, F and de Vargas, C}
}
