@article {Vaulot2008,
	title = {The diversity of small eukaryotic phytoplankton ({\textexclamdown}3 {\textmu}m) in marine ecosystems},
	volume = {32},
	number = {5},
	year = {2008},
	note = {Publication Title: FEMS microbiology reviews tex.mendeley-tags: 2008,rcc,sbr?hyto$_\textrmd$ipo},
	pages = {795{\textendash}820},
	abstract = {Small cells dominate photosynthetic biomass and primary production in many marine ecosystems. Traditionally, picoplankton refers to cells {\textexclamdown} or =2 microm. Here we extend the size range of the organisms considered to 3 microm, a threshold often used operationally in field studies. While the prokaryotic component of picophytoplankton is dominated by two genera, Prochlorococcus and Synechococcus, the eukaryotic fraction is much more diverse. Since the discovery of the ubiquitous Micromonas pusilla in the early 1950s, just over 70 species that can be {\textexclamdown}3 microm have been described. In fact, most algal classes contain such species. Less than a decade ago, culture-independent approaches (in particular, cloning and sequencing, denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis, FISH) have demonstrated that the diversity of eukaryotic picoplankton is much more extensive than could be assumed from described taxa alone. These approaches revealed the importance of certain classes such as the Prasinophyceae but also unearthed novel divisions such as the recently described picobiliphytes. In the last couple of years, the first genomes of photosynthetic picoplankton have become available, providing key information on their physiological capabilities. In this paper, we discuss the range of methods that can be used to assess small phytoplankton diversity, present the species described to date, review the existing molecular data obtained on field populations, and end up by looking at the promises offered by genomics.},
	keywords = {2008, diversity, genomics, Marine ecosystems, Micro-algae, picoplankton, rcc, sbr?hyto$_\textrmd$ipo, taxonomy},
	author = {Vaulot, Daniel and Eikrem, Wenche and Viprey, Manon and Moreau, Herv{\'e}}
}
@article {Viprey2008,
	title = {Wide genetic diversity of picoplanktonic green algae (Chloroplastida) in the Mediterranean Sea uncovered by a phylum-biased PCR approach},
	journal = {Environmental Microbiology},
	volume = {10},
	number = {7},
	year = {2008},
	note = {tex.mendeley-tags: 2008,rcc,sbr?hyto$_\textrmd$ipo},
	pages = {1804{\textendash}1822},
	abstract = {The genetic diversity of picoplanktonic (i.e. cells that can pass through a 3 mum pore-size filter) green algae was investigated in the Mediterranean Sea in late summer by a culture-independent approach. Genetic libraries of the 18S rRNA gene were constructed using two different primer sets. The first set is commonly used to amplify the majority of eukaryotic lineages, while the second was composed of a general eukaryotic forward primer and a reverse primer biased towards the phylum Chloroplastida. A total of 3980 partial environmental sequences were obtained: 1668 using the general eukaryotic primer set and 2312 using the Chloroplastida-biased primer set. Of these sequences, 65 (4\%) and 594 (26\%) belonged to the Chloroplastida respectively. A 99.5\% sequence similarity cut-off value allowed classification of these 659 Chloroplastida sequences into 74 different operational taxonomic units. A majority of the Chloroplastida sequences (99\%) belonged to the prasinophytes. In addition to the seven independent prasinophyte lineages previously described, we discovered two new clades (clades VIII and IX), as well as a significant genetic diversity at the species and subspecies levels, notably among the genera Crustomastix, Dolichomastix and Mamiella (Mamiellales), but also within Pyramimonas and Halosphaera (Pyramimonadales). Such diversity within prasinophytes has not previously been observed by cloning approaches, illustrating the power of using targeted primers for clone library construction. Prasinophyte assemblages differed especially in relation to nutrient levels. Micromonas and Ostreococcus were mainly recovered from mesotrophic areas, whereas Mamiella, Crustomastix and Dolichomastix were mostly detected in oligotrophic surface waters. Within genera such as Ostreococcus or Crustomastix for which several clades were observed, depth seemed to be the main factor controlling differential distribution of genotypes.},
	keywords = {2008, rcc, sbr?hyto$_\textrmd$ipo},
	author = {Viprey, Manon and Guillou, Laure and Ferr{\'e}ol, Martial and Vaulot, Daniel}
}
